Remember?

I have only briefly glanced at what the Mudville Gazette has arranged for us to read here. The point that I just want to briefly make is that our adherence to Congress of Vienna era defintions of nation-states is severly limiting our ability to conduct the war against Islamofascism as it could be. For all intents and purposes, we have been fighting a significant "hot" phase of the war since we decided to repel Saddam from Kuwait, with multiple flare-ups, showdowns, bombing campaigns, invasion, occupation, and reconstruction. And now we're engaged in a national debate with the Seriously Stuck on Stupid Party that seems intent on doing everything they can to succeed in bringing back enforcement of the Sedition Acts while the Republicans cower behind the corner asking frightfully, "Are you sure we're the majority?"
As to the limitations imposed on us by essentially pre-World War I rules concerning the behavior of nation-states, keep this in mind: the people of the Muslim world generally view themselves as Muslim first, nationality second. But for Muslims this identity is deeper than the identity that Christians create concerning their relationship with their savior--for Muslims, Islam is the only institution that hasn't failed them (though it has), hasn't abandoned them, hasn't left them shuddering in the face of centuries of collective might from what they consider to be primitive and barbaric civilizations. Thus, think of the Muslim people living in Europe, they are united by an extranationality that goes beyond whether or not they are Moroccans or Afghans or Algerians--they are Muslim.
The nation-states that are all involved (for the most part) are constructs of the post-colonial world. They are not nation-states in the tradition of the West, geographic areas of common language, culture, traditions, heritage, but are instead, just drawn lines. Even Iran, a country that can trace its' roots back to Persia, is not a Persian country. For one thing, Persians were not Muslims. But that's beside the point. One could argue that Iran is perhaps the most complete nation within the umma that has roots that could be argued are more Western in nature than any other umma state, even Turkey, though that may be a toss-up. We should stop treating these separate "states" as separate entities when they are in fact only separate in administration, they are not separate in drive, motivation, and their ultimate desire, to establish a global umma.
Had we felt this way in the getgo, we would never have stopped at Kuwait in 1991, we would have liberated Iraq in 1991 and done the hard task that we are now engaged in.
And finally, think about all those countries that the United States never stopped "occupying" and think of how much we poured into making sure that Europe remained safe from the the threat of communism, how up until ten years ago there were still 200,000+ troops in Europe and more than 100,000+ in Asia. Are we supposed to simply call those troops home to, because they are been engaged in nation-building for the better part of sixty years now?
Great nations must do great things, otherwise they become great history. And I have no interest in seeing our nation-state, a nation-state forged on the backs of countless free men and women, becoming a great nation-state historically. Again, I implore the President to seek a declaration of war against all state-sponsors of terrorism and the terrorists themselves. Action is what gave the President his significant domestic legislative victories. Inaction is what has caused the President to become mired in the mediocrity that is the US Congress.